Discharge to a Skilled Nursing Facility After Hip Fracture Results in Higher Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in elderly patients are associated with major morbidity and mortality. The influence of postoperative discharge location on recovery and outcomes after arthroplasty for hip fractures is not well understood. METHODS: A multisite retrospective cohort from 9 academic centers identified patients who had FNF treated with hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty between 2010 and 2019. Patients who had diagnoses of dementia, stroke, age > 80 years, or high energy fracture were excluded. Discharge location was identified, including home-based health services (HHS), inpatient rehabilitation (IPR), or a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Rates of reoperation, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and mortality were compared between cohorts. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed, adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index, sex, and tobacco use. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 672 patients (315 HHS, 144 IPR, and 213 SNF) were included in this study. The average follow-up was 30 months. The SNF cohort was significantly older (P < .0001) with higher ASA scores (P < .0001) than the HHS cohort. In a logistic regression model adjusting for age, ASA score, and body mass index, the SNF cohort had higher mortality rates than the HHS cohort (P = .0296) and were more likely to have PJI within 90 days (odds ratio = 4.55, 95% confidence interval = 1.40, 4.74) and within 1 year (odds ratio = 3.08, 95% confidence interval = 1.08, 8.78). Time to PJI was significantly shorter in the SNF cohort (SNF 38 versus HHS 231 days, P = .0155). No differences were seen in dislocation or reoperation rates between the SNF and HHS cohorts. No differences were seen in complication rates between the IPR and HHS cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge to a SNF after arthroplasty for FNF is associated with increased mortality and higher rates of PJI. Hip fracture care pathways that uniformly discharge patients to SNFs may need to be re-evaluated, and surgeons should consider discharge to home with HHS when possible.

Similar Efficacy and Lower Cost Associated With Ceftazidime Compared to Tobramycin Coupled With Vancomycin in Antibiotic Spacers in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin and tobramycin have traditionally been used in antibiotic spacers. In 2020, our institution replaced tobramycin with ceftazidime. We hypothesized that the use of ceftazidime/vancomycin (CV) in antibiotic spacers would not lead to an increase in treatment failure compared to tobramycin/vancomycin (TV). METHODS: From 2014 to 2022, we identified 243 patients who underwent a stage I revision for periprosthetic joint infection. The primary outcome was a recurrent infection requiring antibiotic spacer exchange. We were adequately powered to detect a 10% difference in recurrent infection. Patients who had a prior failed stage I or two-stage revision for infection, acute kidney injury prior to surgery, or end-stage renal disease were excluded. Given no other changes to our spacer constructs, we estimated cost differences attributable to the antibiotic change. Chi-square and t-tests were used to compare the two groups. Multivariable logistic regressions were utilized for the outcomes. RESULTS: The combination of TV was used in 127 patients; CV was used in 116 patients. Within one year of stage I, 9.8% of the TV group had a recurrence of infection versus 7.8% of the CV group (P = .60). By final follow-up, results were similar (12.6 versus 8.6%, respectively, P = .32). Adjusting for potential risk factors did not alter the results. Cost savings for ceftazidime versus tobramycin are estimated to be $68,550 per one hundred patients treated. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing tobramycin with ceftazidime in antibiotic spacers yielded similar periprosthetic joint infection eradication success at a lower cost. While larger studies are warranted to confirm these efficacy and cost-saving results, our data justifies the continued investigation and use of ceftazidime as an alternative to tobramycin in antibiotic spacers.

Decreased Patellar Fractures and Subluxation With Patellar Component Replacement at Stage-One Spacer.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection is a devastating complication of total knee arthroplasty and is often treated with 2-stage revision. We retrospectively assessed whether replacing the patellar component with articulating stage-one spacers was associated with improved outcomes compared to spacers without patellar component replacement. METHODS: A total of 139 patients from a single academic institution were identified who underwent an articulating stage-one revision total knee arthroplasty and had at least 1-year follow-up. Of the 139 patients, 91 underwent patellar component removal without replacement, while 48 had a patellar component replaced at stage-one revision. Patellar fracture and reinfection at any point after stage-one were recorded. Knee range of motion (ROM), patellar thickness, lateral tilt, and lateral displacement were measured at 6-weeks post stage-one. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t-tests were utilized for comparisons. There were no significant demographic differences between groups. RESULTS: Patellar component replacement at stage-one revision was associated with fewer patellar fractures (2.1 versus 12.1%, P = .046), less lateral patellar displacement (1.7 versus 16.0 mm, P < .01), and improved pre to postoperative knee ROM 6 weeks after stage-one (+5.9 versus -11.4°, P = .03). There was no difference in reinfections after stage-2 revision for the replaced or unreplaced patellar groups (15.4 versus 15%, P = 1.000). While the mean time between stage-one and stage-2 was not different (5.2 versus 4.5 months, P = .50), at one-year follow-up, significantly more patients in the patellar component replacement group were satisfied and refused stage-2 revision (45.8 versus 3.3%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Replacing the patellar component at stage-one revision is associated with a decreased rate of patellar fracture and lateral patellar subluxation, improved ROM, and possible increased patient satisfaction, as reflected by nearly half of these patients electing to keep their spacer. There was no difference in reinfection rates between the cohorts.

Risk Factors for Return to the Emergency Department and Readmission After Same-Day Discharge Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge (SDD) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is safe and cost effective. However, benefits may be offset by the potential cost of emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions. We identified risk factors for return to the ED and readmission in patients who underwent SDD and inpatient (IP) stays after TJA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent primary TJA at an academic institution over the course of one year. There were 1,708 consecutive TJAs (721 THA [total hip arthroplasty] and 987 TKA [total knee arthroplasty]) included. A SDD occurred after 1,199 (70%) TJAs, 523 THAs, and 676 TKAs. We compared the demographics and comorbidities of patients who have SDD or IP who stayed following TJA. We documented rates of return to the ED or readmission within 90 days of surgery. Cohorts were compared using the Student's t-test or Chi-square test. Significant findings were those with P value < .05. RESULTS: The SDD cohort had a significantly higher rate of young, non-White men who had a lower body mass index and fewer comorbidities than the IP cohort. Rates of return to ED and readmission were similar between SDD and IP cohorts after TJA and similar between THA and TKA. Factors that significantly influenced return to ED included a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (SDD, IP), a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (SDD, IP), a lower body mass index (IP), and a psychological diagnosis (SDD, IP). Factors that significantly influenced readmission rates included a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (SDD), older age (SDD), and psychological diagnosis (SDD, IP). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who discharged the same day after primary TJA have similar rates of return to the ED and readmission as those admitted as an IP. Patients who had a psychological diagnosis, and particularly a diagnosis of depression, are at higher risk for return to the ED and readmission after primary TJA, regardless of discharge the same-day or IP admission. Improved measures that attempt to further treat and optimize this patient population could reduce unnecessary postoperative ED visits.

A "Dry Tap" in Prosthetic Joint Infection Workup of Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Reassuring.

BACKGROUND: Synovial fluid analysis is important in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The rate of culture-positive PJI in patients who have a dry tap of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well described. METHODS: We reviewed all image-guided THA aspirations, performed from 2014 to 2021 at a single academic institution. Aspirations were categorized as successful (≥ 0.5 mL) or unsuccessful (< 0.5 mL, "dry tap"). We analyzed culture data on all repeat aspirations and revision surgeries performed within 90 days of the initial dry tap. RESULTS: We reviewed 275 consecutive attempted THA aspirations of which 100 (36.4%) resulted in a dry tap. The dry tap cohort had a significantly higher percentage of fluoroscopic-guided aspirations (64%) and fewer ultrasound-guided aspirations (36%) compared to the successful aspiration cohort (48.9% fluoroscopic, 53.1% ultrasound, P = .0061). Of the 100 patients who have dry taps, 48 underwent revision surgery within 90 days of the initial dry tap, and 15 resulted in 2 or more positive cultures. The rate of PJI defined by MusculoSkeletal Infection Society major criteria in the dry tap cohort was 16.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Attempted aspiration of a THA resulted in a dry tap 36.4% of the time. Of those patients who had a dry tap, 16.0% were subsequently found to have PJI based on MusculoSkeletal Infection Society major criteria. Therefore, a "dry tap" does not exclude the diagnosis of infection and should not be considered reassuring for the absence of PJI.

Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty at a High-Volume Academic Center: An Analysis of Failure to Launch.

BACKGROUND: Unanticipated failure to discharge home (failure to launch, FTL) following scheduled same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is problematic for the surgical facility with respect to staffing, care coordination, and reimbursement concerns. The aim of this study was to review rates, etiologies, and contributing factors for FTL in SDD TJA at an inpatient academic medical center. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary TJA between February 2021 and February 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Of those scheduled for SDD, risk factors for FTL were compared with successful SDD. Readmission and emergency department (ED) visits were compared with historical cohorts. There were 3,093 consecutive primary joint arthroplasties performed, of which 2,411 (78%) were scheduled for SDD. RESULTS: Overall, SDD was successful in 94.2% (n = 2,272) of patients who had an FTL rate of 5.8%. Specifically, SDD was successful in 91.4% with total hip arthroplasty, 96.0% with total knee arthroplasty, and 98.6% with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Factors that significantly increased the risk of FTL included general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia (P < .0001), later surgery start time (P < .0001), longer surgical time (P = .0043), higher estimated blood loss (P < .0001), women (P = .0102), younger age (P = .0079), and lower preoperative mental health patient-reported outcomes scores (P = .0039). Readmission and ED visit rates were not higher in the SDD group when compared to historical controls (P = .6830). CONCLUSIONS: With a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach dedicated to improving SDDs at an academic medical center, we have seen successful SDD in nearly 80% of primary TJA, with an FTL rate of 5.8%, and no increased risk of readmission or ED visits. Without adding many personnel, hospital recovery units, or other resources, simple interventions to help decrease FTL have included enhanced preoperative education and expectation settings, improved perioperative communications, reallocating personnel from the inpatient to the outpatient setting, the use of short-acting spinal anesthetics, and earlier scheduled surgery times.

Impact of Demographic Variables on Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Several patient factors affect recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the impact of these variables on patient-reported outcome measure recovery curves following THA has not been defined. Our goal was to quantify the influence of multiple variables on recovery after primary THA. METHODS: There were 1,724 patients in a multicenter study included. Variables included sex, race/ethnicity, anxiety/depression, body mass index, tobacco, and preoperative opioid use. The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) was recorded at multiple time points. Recovery curves were created using longitudinal estimating equations. RESULTS: Patients who were women, obese, or smokers demonstrated lower HOOS JR scores at all time points. Preoperative opioid use was also correlated with lower HOOS JR scores, but this difference diminished after 6 months. Black patients demonstrated lower HOOS JR scores compared to Caucasians, and this relative difference increased out to 1-year postoperatively (P = .018). Hispanics also had lower HOOS JR scores, but scores recovered at similar rates compared to non-Hispanics. Patients who had only anxiety or depression had similar HOOS JR scores compared to patients who did not have anxiety or depression. However, patients who had both anxiety and depression had lower HOOS JR scores compared to patients who had neither (P = .049), and this relative difference became greater at 1-year postoperatively (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Several factors including race/ethnicity, opioid use, and mental health influence recovery trajectory following THA. This information helps provide more individualized counseling about expectations after THA and focus targeted interventions to improve outcomes in at-risk groups.

Metallosis and Corrosion Associated With Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties With Metaphyseal Sleeves.

Metallosis and corrosion have been associated with metal-on-metal and modular total hip arthroplasty but are rarely described in the setting of primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this series, we report on cases of metallosis due to mechanically assisted crevice corrosion at modular junctions of machined trunnion-bore tapers in a revision TKA system with metaphyseal sleeves. The unique design of metal modular junctions used in sleeve-based revision TKA, along with potential patient and surgical factors, may predispose these designs to fretting, corrosion, and adverse reaction to metal debris. We now consider metallosis and corrosion in the workup of painful or failed revision TKAs with sleeves. Future studies that investigate the incidence of this phenomenon may be warranted.

Recovery Curves for Patient Reported Outcomes and Physical Function After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used for evaluating patient satisfaction and function following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Functional measures along with chronologic modeling may help set expectations perioperatively. Our goal was to define the trajectory of recovery and function in the first year following THA. METHODS: Prospective data from 1,898 patients in a multicenter study was analyzed. The PROMs included the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Score for Joint Replacement and EuroQol-5 dimension. Physical activity was recorded on a wearable technology. Data was collected preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate outcomes over time. RESULTS: Significant improvement occurred between preoperative and postoperative time points for all PROMs. The PROMs showed the greatest proportional recovery within the first month postoperatively, each improving by at least 1 minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Daily steps and flights of stairs took longer to reach at least 1 MCID (3 months and 1 year, respectively). Gait speed and walking asymmetry returned to baseline by 3 months, but did not reach a MCID of improvement by 1 year. CONCLUSION: Patients can be counseled that the greatest proportional improvement in PROMs is within 1 month after THA, while function surpasses preoperative baselines by 3 months, and gait quality may not improve until after 1 year. This can help set realistic expectations and target interventions toward patients deviating from the norm.

Recovery Curve for Patient Reported Outcomes and Objective Physical Activity After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Multicenter Study Using Wearable Technology.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the trajectory of recovery based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and objective metrics of physical activity measures over the first 12 months post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: In total, 1,005 participants who underwent a primary unilateral TKA surgery between November 2018 and September 2021 from a multisite prospective study were analyzed. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate PROs and objective physical activity measures over time. RESULTS: All Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and steps per day scores were greater than preoperative scores (P < .05). The flights of stairs per day, gait speed, and walking asymmetry all declined at 1 month (all, P < .001). However, all subsequent scores improved by 6 months (all, P < .01). The greatest clinically important differences from previous visit in KOOS JR (ß = 18.1; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 17.2, 19.0), EQ-5D (ß = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.12), steps per day (ß = 1,169.3; 95% CI = 1,012.7, 1,325.9), gait speed (ß = -0.05; 95% CI = -0.06, -0.03), and walking asymmetry (ß = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.03, 0.03) were observed at 3 months. CONCLUSION: The KOOS JR, EQ-5D, and steps per day measures showed earlier improvements than other physical activity metrics, with the greatest magnitude of improvement within the first 3 months post-TKA. The greatest magnitude of improvement in walking asymmetry was not observed until 6 months, while gait speed and flights of stairs per day were not observed until 12 months. This data may further help provide expectation setting information to patients before surgery, and may aid in identifying outliers to the normal recovery curve who may benefit from targeted interventions.

Trends in Total Knee Arthroplasty Cementing Technique Among Arthroplasty Surgeons-A Survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Members.

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening persists as one of the leading causes of failure following cemented primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cement technique may impact implant fixation. We hypothesized that there is variability in TKA cement technique among arthroplasty surgeons. METHODS: A 28-question survey regarding variables in surgeons' preferred TKA cementation technique was distributed to 2,791 current American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) members with a response rate of 30.8% (903 respondents). Patterns of responses were analyzed by grouping respondents by their answers to certain questions including cementing technique, tibial cement location, and femoral cement location. RESULTS: A total of 73.5% reported performing at least 7 of 8 of the highest consensus techniques, including vacuum mixing (79.9%), using two bags (76.1%), tibial implant first (95.2%), single-stage cementing (96.9%), compression of the implants in extension (91.7%), and use of a tourniquet (84.3%). Medium and high viscosity cement was most commonly used (37.9 and 37.8%, respectively). Finger pressurization was most common (76.1%) compared to a gun (29.8%). There were 26.5% of respondents performing 6 or fewer of the most common majority techniques and seemed to perform other less common techniques (eg, use of a single bag of cement, trialing or closure prior to cement curing, and heating to accelerate cement curing). Cement was most commonly applied to the entire bone and implant surface on both the tibia (46.4%) and femur (47.7%), leaving much variation in the remaining cement application location responses. DISCUSSION: There appears to be variability in cemented TKA technique among arthroplasty surgeons. There were 26.5% of respondents performing less of the majority techniques and also performed other additional low-response rate techniques. Further studies that look at the impacts of variation in techniques on outcomes may be warranted. Our study demonstrates the need for defining best practices for cement technique given the substantial variability identified.

Bilateral Erosive Septic Hip Arthritis Following Pregnancy.

We report on a 34-year-old female whose normal spontaneous vaginal delivery was complicated by Group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization. She developed postpartum, bilateral, rapidly destructive septic hip arthritis. She was treated with bilateral articulating, antibiotic-impregnated spacers, 6 weeks of parenteral antibiotics, and subsequent conversion to total hip arthroplasties. In pregnant women, GBS can result in bacteremia, urinary tract infection, endometritis, and pneumonia. Less commonly, GBS can lead to endocarditis, sacroiliitis, or septic arthritis. Septic arthritis of the hip following pregnancy has been described in a limited number of case reports, yet none, to our knowledge, with rapid bilateral destruction requiring two-staged conversion to total hip replacement.

Prospective, Randomized, Surgeon-Blinded Comparison of Standard Magnification Assumption vs Magnification Marker Usage for Preoperative Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: We undertook this prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded study to compare the accuracy of using of a magnification marker on preoperative radiographs for templating vs using a standard 21% magnification. METHODS: One hundred consecutive total hip arthroplasties were randomized to preoperative templating using a 25-mm magnification marker (50 patients) or a standard 21% magnification (50 patients). Intraoperative data were collected regarding the actual and predicted size of the femoral and acetabular components. RESULTS: The 2 groups were found to be comparable with respect to body mass index (28.9 vs 27.9, P = .26) and gender (P = .69). In the magnification marker group, we predicted the femoral size within 1 size in 80% of the cases and the acetabular component in 94%. In the group of a standard 21% magnification, we predicted the femoral size within 1 size in 90% of the cases and the acetabular component in 96%. These proportions did not statistically differ (femur: χ2P = .16, odds ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.7-7.1; acetabulum: χ2P = .65, odds ratio = 1.5, 95% confidence interval = 0.3-9.6). CONCLUSION: We did not detect a statistically significant difference in accuracy by using one method over the other when comparing the accuracy of component size selection. As the use of the magnification marker adds to the time and expense of preoperative radiographic acquisition, we feel using a standard 21% magnification is an equally accurate technique.

Acetabular Abduction and Dislocations in Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There is purported improvement in component positioning and hip stability with the use of direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA). We sought to determine if there is a difference in acetabular component position or dislocation frequency between DAA and posterior THA. METHODS: One arthroplasty fellowship-trained surgeon introduced DAA THA into his practice. From the initiation of DAA in 4/2012-8/2015, this comparative series resulted in 66 DAA THAs. A matched cohort (age, gender, body mass index [BMI], and comorbidities) was then created for posterior THA, 66 hips. DAA THA used fluoroscopy with anterior capsular excision; posterior group used no image guidance and had capsular repair. Posterior group BMI was 27.8 and DAA group BMI was 27.6 (P = .36). Minimum 3-month follow-up occurred in both groups. RESULTS: Average acetabular abduction angle in the posterior group was 41.9° (range, 32°-60°; standard deviation [sdev], 6.24) and DAA group 43.8° (range, 30°-62°; sdev 6.9), P = .12. The percentage of outliers (outside Lewinnek safe zone, 30°-50°) was 9.1% (6 of 66) in posterior group and 13.6% (9 of 66) in DAA group. There were 2 anterior dislocations in the DAA THA group and 1 anterior dislocation in the posterior THA group, resulting in P = .56. The DAA dislocation frequency in this group was overall higher at 3.0% (2 of 66) compared with the matched posterior (1.5%, 1 of 66) and unmatched posterior larger series (.8%, 3 of 360). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated no observable difference in hip stability or acetabular abduction. This study provides realistic outcomes for surgeons implementing DAA THA into their practice.

Inaccuracies in the Use of Magnification Markers in Digital Hip Radiographs.

BACKGROUND: With the ubiquity of digital radiographs, the use of digital templating for arthroplasty has become commonplace. Although improved accuracy with digital radiographs and magnification markers is assumed, it has not been shown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We wanted to (1) evaluate the accuracy of magnification markers in estimating the magnification of the true hip and (2) determine if the use of magnification markers improves on older techniques of assuming a magnification of 20% for all patients. METHODS: Between April 2013 and September 2013 we collected 100 AP pelvis radiographs of patients who had a THA prosthesis in situ and a magnification marker placed per the manufacturer's instructions. Radiographs seen during our standard radiographic review process, which met our inclusion criteria (AP pelvic view that included a well-positioned and observed magnification marker, and a prior total hip replacement with a known femoral head size), were included in the analysis. We then used OrthoView(TM) software program to calculate magnification of the radiograph using the magnification marker (measured magnification) and the femoral head of known size (true magnification). RESULTS: The mean true magnification using the femoral head was 21% (SD, 2%). The mean magnification using the marker was 15% (SD, 5%). The 95% CI for the mean difference between the two measurements was 6% to 7% (p < 0.001). The use of a magnification marker to estimate magnification at the level of the hip using standard radiographic techniques was shown in this study to routinely underestimate the magnification of the radiograph using an arthroplasty femoral head of known diameter as the reference. If we assume a magnification of 20%, this more closely approximated the true magnification routinely. With this assumption, we were within 2% magnification in 64 of the 100 hips and off by 4% or more in only four hips. In contrast, using the magnification marker we were within 2% of true magnification in only 20 hips and were off by 4% or more in 59 hips. CONCLUSION: We found the use of a magnification marker with digital radiographs for preoperative templating to be generally inaccurate, with a mean error of 6% and range from -5% to 15%. Additionally, these data suggest that the use of a magnification marker while taking preoperative radiographs of the hip may be unnecessary, as simply setting the software to assume a 20% magnification actually was more accurate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Modular Versus Nonmodular Femoral Necks for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), proximal femoral neck stem modularity (PFNSM) has theoretical advantages over nonmodular stems, including the ability to more closely reconstruct anatomy and improve stability. However, risks of metallosis and breakage at the junction must be considered. In this study, we compared the head centers of a modular neck system with that of its nonmodular counterpart. Of 463 primary THAs with a modular stem, 261 (56%) had a head center equivalent to that of its nonmodular counterpart, and an additional 132 (29%) had a head center within 4 mm in length and 2 mm of offset. Thus, only 70 stems (15%) had a head center that was more than 4 mm in length and more than 2 mm in offset different from the nonmodular stem. Only 12 stems had a verted neck. These findings suggest that, in a majority of primary THAs, use of a modular stem results in head center positions also achievable with a nonmodular stem. Given the risks of modularity, PFNSM should be used with caution. We recommend PFNSM in cases that cannot be reconstructed with the nonmodular option.

Lessons learned from managing a prospective, private practice joint replacement registry: a 25-year experience.

BACKGROUND: In 1984, we developed a private practice joint replacement registry (JRR) to prospectively follow patients undergoing THA and TKA to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and implant survival. Little has been reported in the literature regarding management of this type of database, and it is unclear whether and how the information can be useful for addressing longer-term questions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We answered the following questions: (1) What is the rate of followup for THA and TKA in our JRR? (2) What factors affect followup? (3) How successful is this JRR model in capturing data and what areas of improvement are identified? And (4) what costs are associated with maintaining this JRR? METHODS: We collected clinical data on all 12,047 patients having primary THA and TKA since 1984. Clinical and radiographic data were collected at routine followup intervals and entered into a prospective database. We searched this database to assess the rate of successful followup and data collection and to compare the effect of patient variables on followup. Costs related to database management were evaluated. RESULTS: Followup was poor at every time interval after surgery, with a tendency for worsening over time. Patients with a complication and those younger than 70 years tended to followup with greater frequency. There were difficulties with data capture and substantial expenses related to managing the database. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the difficulties in managing a JRR. Followup is poor and data collection is often incomplete. Newer technologies that allow easier tracking of patients and facilitate data capture may streamline this process and control costs.

Total hip arthroplasty after failed internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures.

Between February 1987 and October 2008, we performed 102 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) after failed internal fixation of a prior hip fracture. There were 39 intertrochanteric fractures and 63 femoral neck fractures. Etiology of failure included 35 cases of osteonecrosis, 32 cases of arthritis, 25 cases of early failure of fixation, and 10 cases of nonunion. There were 12 patients who had early surgical complications related to the procedure (11.8%, 12/102). These included 5 patients who had dislocations (4.9%), 4 periprosthetic fractures (3.9%), 2 hematomas (2.0%), and 1 infection (1%). Of these 102 THAs, 50 were available for at least 2 years of follow-up (mean, 3.2 years). At a minimum 2-year follow-up, THA after failed internal fixation of hip fracture in these patients was clinically successful with an elevated risk of periprosthetic fracture and dislocation.

Cost comparison of cementless versus cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Hip hemiarthroplasties are frequently performed for displaced femoral neck fractures. The purpose of this study was to identify the costs associated with cementless and cemented hemiarthroplasties, compare operative times, and identify complications. The hypothesis was that cementless hemiarthroplasties cost less than cemented hemiarthroplasties, require less operative time, and have fewer perioperative complications. A retrospective review was conducted of 2 surgeons' patients admitted for displaced femoral neck fractures between 2006 and 2010. Group 1 included 45 patients who underwent monopolar hemiarthroplasties with cementless femoral components via a standard posterior approach by a single surgeon. Group 2 included 49 patients who underwent monopolar hemiarthroplasties with cemented femoral components via a modified lateral approach by a single surgeon. Surgical and anesthesia times and the cost of implants and accessories were recorded. The cost for cementless components was $3275.60 (femoral stem, $2800; monopolar head, $400; sleeve, $75.60), whereas the cost of cemented components was $3694.47 (femoral stem, $1800; monopolar head, $400; sleeve, $75.60, 3 Simplex with tobramycin cement packets, $1221; cement mixer/irrigator with tip/centralizer and plug/pressurizer, $197.87), a cost savings of 12.7% ($418.87). Operative time was significantly reduced in group 1 vs group 2 (mean, 32.9 vs 56.1 minutes, respectively; P<.01). Anesthesia time was also significantly reduced in group 1 (mean, 82.3 vs 102.9 minutes, respectively; P<.01). The difference in mean anesthetic times demonstrates an overall cost savings of 18.6%, or $1161.30. No difference in complications was noted between the groups perioperatively. Regional cost variances, vendor-hospital contracts, and surgeons' operative times are factors that may influence cost savings. This study demonstrates significantly lower operative and anesthetic times and observable cost savings with cementless femoral implants.

A comparison of two implant systems in restoration of hip geometry in arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Restoration of hip offset and leg length during THA is often limited by available implant geometries. The recent introduction of femoral components with a modular junction at the base of the neck (two modular junction components) has expanded the options to restore femoral offset and leg length. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) whether a femoral component with two modular junctions would predict by templating more frequent restoration of preoperative offset and leg length abnormalities than one with single modular junctions; and (2) how our use of these options compared with national sales data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative templating data in 100 primary THAs using single modular junction implants with only a neutral version stem and 100 THAs using two modular junction implants. We compared the frequency with which the desired leg length and offset were completely restored by preoperative templating in the two groups. RESULTS: Offset and leg lengths were restored to within 1 mm in 85% of cases with two modular junction implants and 60% of cases with single modular junction implants. An anteverted or a retroverted neck was used in 25% of cases with the two modular junction stems. The national sales data revealed femoral neck components with version were used in 28% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a femoral component with two modular junctions resulted in more frequent ability to restore femoral offset and leg length than a single modular junction. The advantage of clinical flexibility should be tempered by the potential concerns of prosthetic mechanical failure (which has been reported in another implant system with two modular junctions), increased third-body wear and corrosive debris, and increased prosthetic cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.